US Offshore Wind Projects Dying Off

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
I heard Australia was ramping up or going to ramp up off shore wind power
Many countries are...huge projects. They just were not a particularly good idea for much of the Atlantic coast for a number of reasons. Reality is clearing the table of many projects that were not economically viable.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
I know it's speculative, but surprised they didn't comment on marine life and the sudden whale deaths. It was all and totally about the $ and ROR.
You nailed it...the whale death cause(s) are still very speculative. That aside, wind power proponents have proven to care very little about wildlife carnage that is, or might be, associated with wind turbine operations.
 

Sneakers

Just sneakin' around....
You nailed it...the whale death cause(s) are still very speculative. That aside, wind power proponents have proven to care very little about wildlife carnage that is, or might be, associated with wind turbine operations.
Turbines create noise in the water, both low and high frequency. It has to be disrupting to marine life.
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...

As one commenter wrote: "There is no free lunch. The energy from these windmills will never be greater than the energy required to make, install, maintain and retire them when they are worn out in 20-30 years, The cost of that energy when storage and stand-by generation is added will destroy the economy of those who think because the wind and sun are free, so is the energy. The tax subsidies merely hide the true cost. The taxpayer pays either way, directly or indirectly, that ignores the other costs. There is no free lunch."

In addition: Any project, or new idea, that requires/needs government subsidies, is a scam. If, they are/were to be so profitable, the private sector would shoulder all the risk and do it themselves. Same with solar panels.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Wind Farm Projects are Beginning to Topple Due to Strong Economic Headwinds


Climate cult dominoes are continuing to fall.



A couple of weeks ago, Sweden’s government ditched plans to go all-in on “green energy,” green-lighting the construction of new nuclear power plants. Shortly afterward, fossil fuel giant Shell announced it was scaling back its energy transition plans to focus on . . . gas and oil!


Now it looks like specific wind farm projects are beginning to topple due to strong economic headwinds. Recent, Rhode Island’s leading utility decided to nix a project called Revolution Wind 2 because the cost of the electricity was deemed too high.

“Higher interest rates, increased costs of capital and supply chain expenses, as well as the uncertainty of federal tax credits, all likely contributed to higher proposed contract costs,” said the utility, Rhode Island Energy, in a press release. “Those costs were ultimately deemed too expensive for customers to bear and did not align with existing offshore wind power purchase agreements.”

Those same cost factors are wreaking havoc in Massachusetts. Two major offshore wind developers in Massachusetts are terminating their power purchase agreements with the state’s utilities because the developers say the agreements, hammered by inflation, interest rate hikes, supply chain disruptions, and the war in Ukraine, are no longer sufficient to secure financing for their projects.
The developers hope to rebid the contracts in the state’s next procurement in 2024, presumably at much higher prices. The decision by Rhode Island Energy could foreshadow the pricing Massachusetts might see next year.
 
Top